GDL

Error-Correction on the U.S. Supreme Court: A View from the Clerks’ Memos

ISSN: 0362-3319.
Journal from gdlhub / 2017-08-14 12:04:24
Oleh : SAUL BRENNER, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Dibuat : 2012-06-19, dengan 1 file

Keyword : Error-Correction on the U.S. Supreme Court: A View from the Clerks’ Memos
Subjek : Error-Correction on the U.S. Supreme Court: A View from the Clerks’ Memos
Sumber pengambilan dokumen : KOPERTIS

Why does the Court and its individual justices vote the way they do at the certiorari




(hereinafter cert) vote? This question has engaged the attention of a host of Supreme




Court scholars. One of the variables identified by these scholars is error-correction.




Baum (1992, p. 104) tells us that the justices “more likely to vote to accept a case when




they disagree with the position of the lower court” than when they agree with that




position.




But not everyone agrees. Stem, Gressman, and Shapiro (1986, p. 22 1) state: to resolve the conflicts among the lower courts and to determine questions of




importance . The Supreme Court’s burden and responsibility are too great to permit




it to review and correct every misstep made by the lower courts in the application




of accepted principles. Hence the Court generally will not grant certiorari just




because the decision below may be erroneous.

Beri Komentar ?#(0) | Bookmark

Properti	Nilai Properti
ID Publisher	gdlhub
Organisasi	University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Nama Kontak	Herti Yani, S.Kom
Alamat	Jln. Jenderal Sudirman
Kota	Jambi
Daerah	Jambi
Negara	Indonesia
Telepon	0741-35095
Fax	0741-35093
E-mail Administrator	elibrarystikom@gmail.com
E-mail CKO	elibrarystikom@gmail.com